The science behind “Nagama”

How do the current hindus observe Nagama – worship as serpent goddess with egg and milk; a total diversion in the context of religious past 1500 years back. Reason of worshiping this serpent structure remains; where married woman repay when they do not get pregnant. Doesn't make sense at all snake and pregnancy; let’s unwrap it.

Don’t view the serpent in the context of religion but if we look at ancient science – most ancient science has this snake related topic – what is snake up to? It is not really about snakes but DNA merely. The DNA was first identified and isolated by Friedrich Miescher in 1871, but DNA has been identified during ancient Hindu simultaneously Anunnaki.

DNA is found in other livings so what is so big deal for human then – DNA acts according to genetic; genetic is consist of surrounding changes. E.g Labrador is easier to train compared to boxer breed; the genetic function and DNA changes to suit surrounding factors. Same happens to human (true from chimpanzee to human)  – different weather, different type of food, culture; this is how we are different by skin, way of thinking, behaviors but not at all with different Gods – the supreme is utmost no plural.

For human civilization, DNA to be propofol where we are today; Look at current climate, we couldn’t stand the heat but the new born is able to tolerate the current climate; no doubt the baby is your DNA but genetically enhanced accordingly.


In Hindu the Nagama (double helix), the serpent deity granite stone placed under the peepal tree. The tree of wisdom and the granite releases the attribute of the structure which your bodily soul required. So with the serpent mindset is wrong if you follow the Hinduism which has transformed from the actual track. Hope for those Hindus, when you perform any ritual; if your mind couldn’t accept, please seek for ancient science explanation – it does give better understanding, clears your doubts…   

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wow 224,000 prophets..

Are we practicing by knowing or unwilling to know?